Washington Judge Faces Ethics Violations Over Fraudulent Document
April 30, 2025
A fraudulent document attempt by Judge Ruzumna has resulted in serious ethical implications, as noted by the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct.
A part-time judge from King County, Washington, is facing significant ethical scrutiny after attempting to obtain a parking discount through fraudulent means. The Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct has recommended the removal of Judge David Ruzumna from his position as a result of these actions.
The Incident
In February 2023, Judge Ruzumna presented a document to a parking attendant, claiming it proved his status as a part-time judge. The document, which displayed the official seal of the King County District Court, also featured the signature stamp of another judge. The attempt aimed to secure a discount for a Seattle parking garage located near the courthouse, a benefit not afforded to part-time judges.
Ethics Committee Findings
During an ethics hearing, it was revealed that Ruzumna’s actions were not only unauthorized, but also misleading. The commission stated that part-time judges do not qualify for the $20 discount on parking fees, which generally applies to full-time employees. The commission’s Order, issued on April 25, highlighted significant discrepancies between Ruzumna’s claims and the evidence provided.
Consequences and Reflections
In their ruling, the commission found that Ruzumna had lied regarding the details of the document, stating, “When confronted, Ruzumna lied about the content of the document.” The commission noted that he had created a narrative that became increasingly difficult to uphold as inquiries progressed.
As a result of these findings, Ruzumna has already resigned from his position within the King County courts and has been under scrutiny for his role as a part-time judge in Snohomish County. His lawyer, Anne Bremner, has indicated plans to appeal the commission’s recommendations, asserting that Ruzumna did not lie in his testimony.
Reflecting on the incident, Ruzumna expressed his regret over the actions that led to this controversy, stating, “This whole thing has been a source of embarrassment… amplifying it as my legacy.” He characterized the event as the “dumbest thing” he had ever done.
Next Steps
The Washington Supreme Court will now review the commission’s recommendation regarding Ruzumna’s removal. His case serves as a critical reminder of the ethical standards expected from members of the judiciary.
