On January 16, 2026, Just Security, a leading platform for legal and policy analysis, updated its ongoing litigation tracker that monitors the legal challenges targeting the executive actions of the Trump administration. This tracker provides an extensive overview of over 500 legal cases, spanning a wide array of federal policies and actions implemented during his time in office. From immigration enforcement and travel bans to administrative rulemaking, these cases reflect the wide-reaching impact of the Trump administration’s policies, as well as the significant resistance that has emerged in the courts.
The latest update to the tracker reveals that more than 100 actions taken by the federal government have been temporarily blocked by court orders, often due to legal challenges brought by plaintiffs who argue that these policies were unconstitutional, overreaching, or in violation of federal laws. In addition, the tracker shows that plaintiffs have achieved more than 200 legal victories, which include favorable court rulings that have prevented the government from implementing certain actions or required modifications to existing policies. These victories have been a significant part of the broader resistance to the Trump administration’s policies, illustrating the deep legal and political battles that took place over the past several years.
The Just Security tracker serves as an important resource for a variety of stakeholders, including attorneys, scholars, and policymakers. It provides up-to-date information on the status of these high-profile legal battles, offering detailed insights into which cases are still in progress, which are awaiting appellate review, and which are still pending before the courts. This comprehensive overview allows those involved in or studying these legal challenges to understand the key cases, the decisions made, and the ongoing legal issues that continue to shape the U.S. legal and political landscape.
Additionally, the tracker doesn’t just focus on outcomes but also provides a close look at the legal processes involved in these cases. It tracks motions that are pending before courts, as well as the specific rulings in cases where plaintiffs or the government have achieved favorable outcomes. This level of detail is particularly valuable for legal professionals who rely on accurate, real-time data to inform their work and strategies. By tracking these cases so closely, the Just Security tracker also offers a broader view of the extent to which legal challenges to executive power have influenced the policymaking process and the broader national conversation about the limits of presidential authority.
The Just Security tracker has also become an essential tool for the public and anyone interested in understanding the complex legal battles that shaped much of the Trump administration’s time in office. The legal challenges covered in the tracker have addressed a variety of issues, including controversial policies related to immigration, environmental regulation, healthcare, and the economy. The outcomes of these cases continue to affect the direction of U.S. policy and law, with some cases having a lasting impact on how future administrations will approach executive actions and how the courts will interpret the powers of the presidency.
Overall, the Just Security litigation tracker provides a critical, ongoing resource for understanding the legal landscape of the Trump administration. It offers a detailed, comprehensive look at the many legal challenges that have shaped the policies of this period and continues to be a vital tool for those seeking to understand the intersection of law, politics, and governance in contemporary America. As the courts continue to weigh in on various issues, the tracker will remain an invaluable resource for monitoring the legal process and the evolving impact of these landmark cases.
