On August 6, 2025, Houston immigration attorney Raed Gonzalez filed a federal lawsuit in an attempt to block a controversial new policy implemented by the Trump administration. The policy requires certain immigrants to register with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) within 30 days of entering the country. This includes individuals who entered illegally, Canadian citizens, and those with Temporary Protected Status (TPS) or deferred action who have not previously registered. Additionally, the policy mandates that these immigrants provide fingerprint data and detailed personal information, which could potentially incriminate them regarding their immigration status and criminal history.
Gonzalez argues that the policy violates constitutional protections against self-incrimination. He contends that requiring immigrants to submit such sensitive information could compel them to reveal their legal status and any prior criminal history, which may be used against them in legal proceedings. Furthermore, Gonzalez claims that the administration failed to follow proper procedures by not allowing for public comment before implementing the change, thus bypassing the Administrative Procedure Act. This procedural oversight is a key point in the legal challenge, as Gonzalez asserts that the policy was enacted without the necessary transparency or public input.
Read also: https://jurisreview.com/federal-judge-strikes-down-floridas-new-voter-registration-law/
This lawsuit is part of a broader pattern of legal challenges against the Trump administration’s immigration policies, which many critics argue are designed to make it more difficult for immigrants to remain in the U.S. and discourage new immigration. The administration justifies the new policy as part of a strategy to promote “self-deportation,” hoping that the threat of registration and the potential consequences of non-compliance will encourage immigrants to leave the country voluntarily.
In his legal challenge, Gonzalez plans to expand the lawsuit into a class action, representing a broader group of immigrants potentially affected by the policy. He has named several high-profile federal officials as defendants in the case, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Attorney General Pamela Bondi, both of whom are central figures in the administration’s immigration enforcement strategy. The lawsuit is likely to draw significant attention as it moves through the courts, given its potential implications for immigration policy and the rights of immigrants in the U.S.
This legal battle adds another layer to the ongoing national debate over immigration, with advocates for immigrants arguing that policies like the new registration requirement unfairly burden individuals who are already in vulnerable situations. As the case develops, it will likely contribute to the broader conversation on the balance between national security concerns and the rights of immigrants within the U.S.
