Repercussions at Skadden: Internal Changes and Attorney Departures

Recent reports indicate significant unrest at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP following a controversial decision to restrict attorney email communications via large internal distribution lists. This change arrives on the heels of earlier news that the firm struck a deal with the Trump administration, which reportedly includes a staggering $100 million in pro bono commitments. Many insiders speculate that these incidents are intertwined, particularly after the recent resignation of third-year associate Rachel Cohen via a firm-wide email, expressing her dissatisfaction with Skadden’s response to the Trump administration’s approach to the legal system.

Public Exits and Internal Discontent

In an emerging wave of dissent, Brenna Trout Frey, a senior associate who recently departed from Skadden, took to LinkedIn to articulate her reasons for leaving and urged her colleagues to consider taking similar actions. She expressed disillusionment with the firm’s leadership, highlighting a broader ethical concern regarding Skadden’s dealings with the Trump administration.

“If my employer cannot stand up for the rule of law, then I cannot ethically continue to work for them,” Frey stated.

Concerns Among Staff

Frey’s departure has resonated with many at the firm, as evidenced by a series of responses shared through internal channels and external commentaries. Some attorneys voiced strong disapproval of the firm’s decision to engage with the Trump administration, describing it as a betrayal of the legal principles that the firm purportedly upholds.

• Embarrassment Over Actions: One attorney commented, “This is unfathomably embarrassing. It makes me wonder why institutions amass such power if they’re completely unwilling to act when it’s most necessary.”
• Betrayal of Legacy: Another expressed feelings of betrayal, stating that a commitment to diversity and representation was fundamental to their choice of Skadden as an employer and that the firm’s recent actions contradicted its once-declared values.

Future of Skadden Attorneys

The question now is whether Frey’s call to action will prompt a larger movement within Skadden. With reports indicating a general discontent among attorneys regarding the firm’s recent alignment with political power, an exodus could be on the horizon.

Changing Legal Landscape

The legal profession is currently facing challenges due to an oversaturated job market, particularly in Washington, D.C., following job cuts in government legal roles. This environment complicates the decision for many attorneys contemplating a change amid these controversies.

Ultimately, the actions that Skadden’s attorneys will take in response to this situation remain to be seen. The firm’s leadership is at a crucial juncture where pushing back against political pressures could redefine its reputation, while its attorneys grapple with issues of ethics and loyalty in the face of external demands.

Those within the Skadden community who wish to share their experiences or insights can reach out to Above the Law for a confidential discourse.

Kathryn Rubino serves as the Senior Editor at Above the Law, co-hosting both The Jabot podcast and Thinking Like A Lawyer. Tips, questions, or comments can be directed to her through email or Twitter @Kathryn1.